Drop off your CV
We'd love to hear from you. Send us your CV and one of our specialist consultants will be in touch.
For life sciences startups, securing investment is more competitive and crucial than ever before. Although the sector continues to attract major investment, venture capital firms are increasingly seeking solid evidence that the science works and that there is a clear pathway to return on investment. This requires a strong strategy and leadership teams that combine scientific and commercial expertise.
In this article, we explore what life sciences investors prioritise and how strong leadership can turn scientific breakthroughs into long-term investment success.
Contact CSG Talent to discover how we can support your life sciences funding journey.
While there is no shortage of capital in the global life sciences sector, the way that money is being allocated has changed dramatically in recent years. Investors are deploying funds with much greater care, focusing on businesses that can demonstrate clear clinical and commercial value and a reliable route to profitability.
Two clear patterns have emerged in how venture capital money is being distributed. First, the largest investments are being directed at companies developing powerful drug-making technologies. These are platform businesses, such as AI models that accelerate drug discovery or new approaches to cell and gene therapy, that have the potential to generate multiple treatments rather than a single product. Investors are drawn to them because a successful platform can create a pipeline of therapies, which multiplies ROI potential.
The second pattern that has emerged is that early-stage capital is still flowing into groundbreaking scientific discoveries, particularly those emerging from universities and academic research centres. However, these investments are highly selective and reserved for ideas that can address a significant health challenge and are backed by solid data.
One of the most significant shifts in investor expectations is the demand for human clinical data. It is no longer sufficient for a company to demonstrate that a drug works in a lab or in animal models, investors now want to see evidence that the science benefits humans. Positive results in Phase I or Phase II trials have become the key to large rounds of investment.
This expectation creates a difficult gap for startups to bridge, and moving from pre-clinical research into human trials is where many companies face challenges. This is the point where startups can prove their value, but there are many risks, and the timelines are tight. Companies that can design well-structured trials and reach human data quickly are the most likely to attract further investment.
Venture investors want to know not just whether a startup can secure funding, but how and when they will see a return. The encouraging news is that the ways a company can exit are improving, and the public stock market is now more willing to accept high-quality biotech companies for IPOs, especially those with strong trial data.
However, the most common exit route is still strategic acquisition. Large pharmaceutical companies are actively looking to acquire smaller startups to strengthen their pipelines and secure innovative assets, which means investors are favouring startups that are ready for acquisition. To secure funding, businesses must be designed to appeal to potential buyers by ensuring their drug candidates and clinical data align with what big pharma companies need.
Life sciences R&D is inherently expensive, but investors now expect maximum efficiency and scientific value from their funding. Companies that leverage technology and outsource to CROs or CDMOs are backed with more confidence by investors. The funding landscape is now dominated by specialised life science investors who truly understand the science and demand flawless execution of experiments and a clear plan for reaching key achievements.
It’s important to recognise that your company is a future asset, as investors want to know that if they commit capital, a major pharmaceutical company will be interested in acquiring your business further down the line. To achieve this, you must establish strong patents, generate data that can survive scrutiny, and design your clinical trials in a way that matches what large pharmaceutical companies expect.
You should study recent M&A activity in their specialist area and consider:
The answers to these questions will help you create a clear roadmap for meeting investor expectations.
Investors today are buying into reduced risk rather than pure potential, so you must focus on the most critical experiment or dataset that validates your concept. A company that has one well-executed Phase I trial showing clear effectiveness is much more attractive than a company with multiple poorly executed studies. You should make it clear that you are prepared to pivot or shut down projects that do not meet the required standards, as this reassures investors that their money will be used responsibly.
To maximise your chances of success, keep your internal team small and outsource any activity that isn't central to your core mission. Leverage specialised partners like CROs for research and CDMOs for manufacturing to cut costs, speed up timelines, and allow your internal team to focus on crucial R&D milestones and decision-making.
Building an expert team and advisory board is just as important as the science itself. Investors need proof you have the right expertise to handle everything from clinical trials to getting regulatory approval and eventually selling your product.
You must show that you know how to engage with regulators and can design trials that specifically meet their expectations. Demonstrating that your team has the expertise to navigate the clinical pathway is what gives investors the confidence to commit to funding.
One of the most notable examples of this approach to funding is Insilico Medicine, an AI-driven drug discovery company. In the early stages, Insilico proved that its AI platform could outperform traditional methods by creating a new molecule and preparing it for animal testing in just 46 days. This breakthrough helped secure early-stage funding.
As the company grew, they shifted their focus to building a pipeline of drug candidates and moving them into human trials. The decisive moment came when Insilico advanced its idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis drug into Phase I human trials, securing a $255 million Series C round.
At every stage, the company had a clear answer to the question, "Why invest now?" That reason was always a concrete achievement, such as clinical validation, regulatory approval, or a commercial deal. This demonstrates that the most successful startups stage their funding around these high-value milestones to reduce risk for investors, rather than relying solely on potential.
A great team is the foundation of any successful funding round. Investors consistently look for proven leaders who can navigate scientific, regulatory, and commercial challenges. Key roles include:
For professionals, working at a life sciences startup is a high-risk, high-reward opportunity that demands flexibility, resilience, and a willingness to handle diverse responsibilities. However, it also offers the chance to directly impact company strategy and shape the future of a new therapy. For scientists and leaders motivated by innovation, a startup role can build strong skillsets and accelerate career progression in the life sciences space.
At CSG Talent, we specialise in connecting life sciences businesses with the senior leaders who drive funding success. If you are looking to secure investment or strengthen your executive team, our life sciences executive search experts can help you find the talent that drives success at every trial phase.
If you’re preparing for your next funding round, speak to our life sciences executive search experts today.