The Benefits and Limitations of Psychometric Testing in Recruitment

7 minutes

Psychometric testing has become an increasingly popular tool for assessing potential candidates’ suitability. It can certainly provide valuable insights into an individual’s personality traits, aptitudes, and abilities, positioning itself as a powerful aid in the recruitment process. However, it's crucial for employers to regard this tool as just one facet of their decision-making process and not rely on it as the sole deciding factor. There are potential hazards in using it as a decider that employers should be aware of. 

This article delves into the multifaceted nature of psychometric testing, encompassing both its advantages and challenges, with the aim of guiding employers towards a well-rounded and equitable recruitment approach.


The Benefits of Psychometric Testing:

In the pursuit of evaluating a candidate's fitness for a role, psychometric testing has proven itself invaluable in providing nuanced insights into various traits of an individual. It shines a spotlight on certain aspects that might not be apparent through traditional methods, making it an indispensable addition to the recruitment toolkit.

a. Insights Beyond Surface: Psychometric tests possess the ability to unearth hidden qualities and traits that might not be immediately obvious during interviews or through CV analysis. These tests probe into cognitive abilities, personality dimensions, and even work preferences, enriching the employer's understanding of a candidate's potential.

b. Structured Evaluation: Employers benefit from a standardised approach to evaluation through psychometric testing. By employing rigorously designed assessments, organisations can ensure a consistent benchmark for candidate assessment across the board. This standardisation facilitates more objective and unbiased decision-making.

c. Complementary Tool: Integrating psychometric testing with other evaluation methods, such as interviews, work samples, and reference checks, creating a holistic view of the candidate. Each method brings unique perspectives, which, when combined, allow employers to make well-informed decisions.


Limitations of Psychometric Testing:

While psychometric testing offers profound insights, it's imperative to approach its implementation with an understanding of its limitations and potential pitfalls. When evaluating a person’s suitability for a role the process should aim to get a full understanding of who they are and their potential. Psychometric testing can provide more detail into certain aspects of an individual however it has limitations in assessing the full scope of a candidate.

  1. Lack of Contextual Information: Psychometric tests are limited in the insights they can provide; an individual is subject to the conditions at the time of testing and how they feel in that moment. The test provides insights about specific traits and abilities dependant on testing circumstances. However, there is far more to a potential candidate and the tests fail to address the full spectrum of a person including their real-world performance and potential in the workplace. Factors such as motivation, experience and interpersonal skills are important in understanding someone and they are not accurately reflected in test results. In fact, according to a report by the Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology (SIOP), tests typically explain only about 10% to 20% of the variance in job performance, which in turn provides limited insights into a candidate’s potential.

  1. Potential for Bias: Psychometric testing can be influenced by a range of aspects beyond job performance. Cultural, socioeconomic and education factors can unintentionally introduce bias. It’s important to take caution with these potentially biased outcomes as they can lead to discrimination or a lack of diversity in the workplace.
  2. Incomplete Assessment: As discussed above, these tests do not provide a full assessment of an individual and relying solely on the test results neglects other essential considerations for a candidate’s suitability including their qualifications, relevant experience, and practical skills. A survey conducted by the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) showed that only 18% of HR professionals considered personality and cognitive ability assessments in their hiring decisions while 82% consider relevant work experience as the most important fact in recruitment.


Ethical and Legal Considerations:

In the workplace setting, unfair or biased approaches could possibly incur legal and ethical implications that should be considered before implementation.

  1. Discrimination and Fairness: The risk of discriminating against people based on race, age, disability, gender, or socioeconomic backgrounds is increased when depending on psychometric tests as a deciding factor in hiring decision. It can be a risky manoeuvre and it is imperative that employers ensure the use of these tests complies with antidiscrimination laws and equal opportunity.
  2. Transparency and Informed Consent: To establish a good relationship with candidates, they should be informed in advance that psychometric testing is part of the recruitment process and the purpose of it. Candidates should be provided with clear explanations around how the results will be used and how their privacy will be protected as well. This helps to strengthen rapport in these early stages and ensures employers are acting ethically in their approach. Unfortunately, this is not done often enough with a survey by the Institute of Psychometric Coaching showing that 67% of job applicants were not fully informed about the purpose and use of psychometric tests during the recruitment process.

 

Best Practices for Psychometric Testing:

To help achieve the most effective outcomes in the recruitment process, a skilled and holistic approach should be undertaken.

  1. Multiple Evaluation Methods: When considering recruitment, psychometric testing should be used as one of many components within the process. Using multiple assessment methods such as interviews including scenario type and competency-based questions, work samples and reference checks, allows for a more thorough evaluation of a candidate’s potential.
  2. Validation and Standardisation: Regular reviews should be conducted on psychometric tests being undertaken, they should be properly validated and standardised for the specific job roles being assessed and align with evolving job requirements.

  1. Expertise and Training: Recruiters and hiring managers conducting these tests should undergo thorough training to understand the limitations and potential biases. Psychometric tests should be administered and interpreted by skilled professionals to minimise errors and misinterpretations.

 

Promoting Diversity and Inclusion:

With the potential biases from psychometric testing the best course of action is to utilise the tests in a way that promotes diversity and inclusion rather than limits against it.

  1. Aim to Reduce Bias in Test Design: It may be worth engaging with an expert to help develop and adapt the psychometric tests to minimise biases relating to culture and gender. Throughout the duration of the tests being used, regular reviews should be conducted, and the tests revised to promote fairness and inclusivity.
  2. Consideration of Multiple Data Points: As mentioned previously, aim to get a full understanding of who the candidate is beyond the test outcomes. To emphasize the value of diversity in candidate consideration look at a range of qualifications, experiences and skills throughout the recruitment process. Avoid relying solely on psychometric tests as a primary selection tool.  

 

Psychometric assessments provide valuable insights into candidates' abilities, but it's important to remember that everyone has strengths and areas for growth. These tests should be utilised as tools to understand not only a candidate's current abilities but also how best to support their ongoing development. Psychometric assessments should guide how we support individual development, rather than solely focusing on weaknesses. Fixating on weaknesses can lead to overlooking a candidate's overall potential. It's essential to seek guidance from a qualified professional who can help interpret and contextualize the results for you. By combining assessment insights with expert advice, along with thorough interviews, work samples, and references, you should have a comprehensive understanding of a candidate's fit for the role. 

A valuable tip is to ensure your current employees have also completed the assessment. This provides a benchmark that can be used to measure potential future employees against your existing team. By comparing candidates to your successful employees, you can gain a better understanding of how they align with your organisation's unique requirements and culture, making your hiring decisions even more informed and strategic. Psychometric testing emerges as a powerful tool in the realm of candidate assessment, offering multifaceted insights that enrich the recruitment process. By embracing its benefits while remaining mindful of its limitations, organisations can embark on a journey towards a more comprehensive, inclusive, and equitable approach to hiring.

Organisations and hiring leaders need to ensure they consider these factors as part of their hiring strategies to ensure success in attracting top talent and future leaders to drive their business forward. Our team at CSG Talent are not only experts in their specialist markets but they have in-depth knowledge on talent attraction strategies and work closely with both clients and candidates in establishing market trends, challenges and solutions to hiring. If you would like to have an initial conversation with one of our experts to discuss your hiring plans and strategies, please click here.